eager_load_nested_include_test should not be dependent on id values
Reported by S. Brent Faulkner | August 14th, 2008 @ 03:00 AM | in 2.x
test/cases/associations/eager_load_nested_include_test.rb depends on specific primary values.
In my case, when testing ActiveRecord using MySQL, since my MySQL configuration uses a value other than 1 for auto_increment_increment, then running...
$ rake test_mysql TEST=test/cases/associations/eager_load_nested_include_test.rb
Results in the error...
1) Error:
test_include_query(EagerLoadPolyAssocsTest):
NoMethodError: undefined method non_poly' for nil:NilClass
./test/cases/associations/eager_load_nested_include_test.rb:78:in `test_include_query'
./test/cases/associations/eager_load_nested_include_test.rb:77:in `each'
./test/cases/associations/eager_load_nested_include_test.rb:77:in `test_include_query'
./test/cases/../../lib/active_record/test_case.rb:38:in `assert_queries'
./test/cases/associations/eager_load_nested_include_test.rb:76:in `test_include_query'
./test/cases/../../lib/../../activesupport/lib/active_support/testing/setup_and_teardown.rb:94:in `__send__'
./test/cases/../../lib/../../activesupport/lib/active_support/testing/setup_and_teardown.rb:94:in `run'
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
S. Brent Faulkner August 14th, 2008 @ 05:02 AM
to reproduce this problem you can either...
a) edit your my.cnf to include auto_increment_increment=5 (so that sequential id values are missing)
or
b) run the specific test more than once in a row (so that the first record created is not id == 1)
-
S. Brent Faulkner August 14th, 2008 @ 05:04 AM
- → Tag changed from activerecord bug to activerecord bug patch tests
a patch is attached to remove the dependency on auto incremented id values.
as the original was implemented, the test would fail if the id values assigned to the created objects were not sequential starting at 1
the patched test will now collect the ids of the created records and select from that set instead
-
S. Brent Faulkner August 14th, 2008 @ 05:27 AM
- → Assigned user changed from to Michael Koziarski
-
S. Brent Faulkner August 18th, 2008 @ 01:54 AM
- no changes were found...
-
S. Brent Faulkner August 18th, 2008 @ 01:54 AM
As per suggestions on ruby-core...
- You should probably hold the objects, not the ids in the class arrays.
- You could use after_saves to do the storing
- You could encapsulate the 'get a random one of these' with Foo.random
I modularized the remembering and randomisation, and have attached a new patch.
-
S. Brent Faulkner August 19th, 2008 @ 03:51 PM
- → Title changed from test_include_query(EagerLoadPolyAssocsTest) fails for test_mysql when auto_increment_increment != 1 to eager_load_nested_include_test should not be dependent on id values
-
Michael Koziarski August 21st, 2008 @ 03:45 PM
- → State changed from new to committed
Please Login or create a free account to add a new comment.
You can update this ticket by sending an email to from your email client. (help)
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
Source available from github
The Git repository resides at http://github.com/rails
Check out the current development trunk (Edge Rails) with:
git clone git://github.com/rails/rails.git
Creating or reviewing a patch
See the contributor guide.
Creating a feature request
Please don't. If you want a new feature in Rails, you'll have to pull up your sleeves and get busy yourself. Or convince someone else to do it. See the contributor guide on how to get going. But posting them here is just going to lead to ticket root.
Creating a bug report
When creating a bug report, be sure to include as much relevant information as possible. Post the code sample that causes the problem. Preferably, alter the unit tests and show through either changed or added tests how the expected behavior is not occuring.
Security vulnerabilities should be reported via an email to security@rubyonrails.org, do not use trac for reporting security vulnerabilities. All content in trac is publicly available as soon as it is posted.
Then don't get your hopes up. Unless you have a "Code Red, Mission Critical, The World is Coming to an End" kinda bug, you're creating this ticket in the hope that others with the same problem will be able to collaborate with you on solving it. Do not expect that the ticket automatically will see any activity or that others will jump to fix it. Creating a ticket like this is mostly to help yourself start on the path of fixing the problem and for others to sign on to with a "I'm having this problem too".
