This project is archived and is in readonly mode.

#4097 ✓stale
Deleted User

ActiveSupport::StringInquirer respond_to?

Reported by Deleted User | March 3rd, 2010 @ 10:38 AM

Currently, Rails.env.respond_to?(:production?) returns false, as StringInquirer is not aware of the methods implemented through method_missing.

This patch defines respond_to? on StringInquirer so that it knows that it can respond to methods ending with '?' like the ones defined through method_missing (.production?, .test?, .development?, etc.)

Comments and changes to this ticket

  • Emili Parreño

    Emili Parreño May 14th, 2010 @ 08:59 AM

    +1 consistency is important. All tests OK

  • Jared Pace

    Jared Pace May 14th, 2010 @ 08:18 PM

    +1 Looks good. All tests OK

    • Rob and Jared @ Relevance
  • Santiago Pastorino

    Santiago Pastorino February 2nd, 2011 @ 04:39 PM

    • State changed from “new” to “open”

    This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been commented on for at least three months.

    The resources of the Rails core team are limited, and so we are asking for your help. If you can still reproduce this error on the 3-0-stable branch or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it and add "[state:open]" to your comment. This will reopen the ticket for review. Likewise, if you feel that this is a very important feature for Rails to include, please reply with your explanation so we can consider it.

    Thank you for all your contributions, and we hope you will understand this step to focus our efforts where they are most helpful.

  • Santiago Pastorino

    Santiago Pastorino February 2nd, 2011 @ 04:39 PM

    • State changed from “open” to “stale”

Create your profile

Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »

<h2 style="font-size: 14px">Tickets have moved to Github</h2>

The new ticket tracker is available at <a href=""></a>

People watching this ticket