Rails Ruby on Rails → 3.x

Comments and changes to this ticket

• 

  Andrew White November 18th, 2010 @ 05:15 PM

  What's the use case for this?

• 

  Neeraj Singh November 18th, 2010 @ 05:47 PM

  I guess consistency between habtm and has_many is a good thing.

  Also I think there should be a resolution on has_many through :dependent so that we have consistency across the associations.

• 

  rails February 19th, 2011 @ 12:00 AM

  • State changed from “new” to “open”

  This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been commented on for at least three months.

  The resources of the Rails core team are limited, and so we are asking for your help. If you can still reproduce this error on the 3-0-stable branch or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it and add "[state:open]" to your comment. This will reopen the ticket for review. Likewise, if you feel that this is a very important feature for Rails to include, please reply with your explanation so we can consider it.

  Thank you for all your contributions, and we hope you will understand this step to focus our efforts where they are most helpful.

• 

  rails February 19th, 2011 @ 12:00 AM

  • State changed from “open” to “stale”