This project is archived and is in readonly mode.
Define respond_to? on ActionDispatch::Integration::Runner
Reported by Sven Fuchs | November 21st, 2010 @ 12:50 PM | in 3.x
Since Runner uses method_missing to delegate to the integration session it also should define respond_to? accordingly.
I don't see any unit tests for the runner (or any of the related classes), so I assume it's ok to fix this w/o providing a test?
Here's the commit: https://github.com/svenfuchs/rails/commit/64438c2987b6ead8ec28f5962...
(Umm, once again it seems I can't attach a patch to the ticket? Maybe that's a problem with my chromium?)
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
-
Repository November 22nd, 2010 @ 11:57 PM
- State changed from “new” to “resolved”
(from [e83d15376d7ca10e20a720727f22cc9cdbbd662c]) adding a test for the runner module [#6027 state:resolved] https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/e83d15376d7ca10e20a720727f22c...
-
-
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
<h2 style="font-size: 14px">Tickets have moved to Github</h2>
The new ticket tracker is available at <a href="https://github.com/rails/rails/issues">https://github.com/rails/rails/issues</a>
People watching this ticket
Jeremy Kemper
Sven Fuchs
Tags
Referenced by
-
6027
Define respond_to? on ActionDispatch::Integration::Runner
(from [e83d15376d7ca10e20a720727f22cc9cdbbd662c])
adding ...