Will Bryant
Not a member
Will Bryant's latest activity
Monday, July 27 2009
-
Will Bryant commented at 2:23 PMHmm, one thing that warrents note. I tried this out in a second project and it did cause some spec failures. The underlying problem is that String#to_time retur...
-
Will Bryant commented at 12:43 PM- I discovered the other day that if I have config.time_zone = 'Wellington', I need to explicitly convert my times using #utc before using them in certain condit...
Monday, July 06 2009
-
Will Bryant commented at 4:00 AMWas it intended that this results in filter_parameters being called with scalar arguments, for example when you use:
post :create, :foo => ["bar", "baz"]
filter...
Friday, July 03 2009
-
Will Bryant commented at 12:39 AMI think that's a great idea - if Task.belongs_to :project, :dependent => destroy, then customer.tasks.destroy_all should destroy all projects too.
Otherwise - i...
Thursday, June 04 2009
-
Will Bryant commented at 10:37 AMYeah, I'm hitting the destroy_all issue too - it certainly works fine in a 2.2 app. I see no reason why it should delete the records it goes through; for exampl...
Monday, June 01 2009
-
Will Bryant commented at 3:37 AMAs per discussions on rails-core, the original commit introducing the problem has been reverted for 2-3-stable (reverted in 34c3162), so the forthcoming patch r...
Tuesday, May 12 2009
-
Will Bryant commented at 5:15 AMAs per Koz's suggestion on the mailing list, superclass_delegating_accessor works better - no test changes needed with that.
That in itself works fine.
However,...
Monday, May 11 2009
-
Will Bryant commented at 2:59 AMI'm getting one sqlite test failure from this patch:
1) Failure: test_uniqueness_violations_are_translated_to_specific_exception(AdapterTest)
[./test/cases/ada...
-
Will Bryant commented at 2:39 AMseanskye: I think you most likely have a different issue. This regression first appeared in Rails 2.3 RC2; on 2.2.2 it shouldn't be a problem (we use this funct...