Murray Steele's profile

Murray Steele commented at 9:24 PM
Um... that 2nd link should be to https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3513-inverse_... not back to this one.
Murray Steele commented at 9:21 PM
Also, note that George Ogata has a couple of other tickets ([1], [2]) about improving the inverse_of functionality. We should probably apply them to edge and 2-...
Murray Steele created the ticket at 9:14 PM
Speaking to Eloy Durán on IRC it turned out that some other issues raised against 2.3.x would be solved more easily if the :inverse_of functionality was availab...

- Tag changed from 2.3.2, activerecord, association to 2.3.x, 3.0, activerecord, association
by Murray Steele at 5:32 PM
The same is true if you try to use ActiveRecord::Validations. The similarities are that both active_record/validations.rb and active_record/associations.rb both...

Murray Steele commented at 9:09 AM
As the author of the :inverse_of patch, I have to say I agree with it not slipping into a 2.3.x release when it didn't make 2.3.0. That said, all is not lost, y...

Murray Steele commented at 10:53 PM

Yeah, with a bit more thought I get the point your code snippet makes.

Like you though, I can't really come up with a way of making a belongs_to with an inverse...
Murray Steele commented at 8:43 PM

I think this might be because #object_id is one of the few methods that AssociationProxy doesn't delegate:

http://github.com/rails/rails/bl...

Murray Steele commented at 4:22 PM
I've reworked the patch. The one thing that I'm not sure about is that now it throws an exception if you supply an :inverse_of that doesn't exist, but it just s...

Murray Steele commented at 12:11 PM
Michael Koziarski. I'll put together a new patch with your suggestions. However, just to clear some of them up:
1. I'll use :inverse_of instead of :inverse as the...

Murray Steele commented at 4:05 PM

+1

Looks good to me. Also a pretty sensible addition.