Chris Kampmeier
Not a member
Chris Kampmeier's latest activity
Sunday, November 15 2009
-
Chris Kampmeier commented at 12:28 AMHey Brian, nice catch. I agree that the current behavior isn't correct.
I noticed a few problems with the patch, though:
- You'd need to add stubs for
#exist?to...
- You'd need to add stubs for
Monday, March 16 2009
-
Chris Kampmeier commented at 1:31 PMThis is already available as
ActiveRecord::Base#update_all. See the API docs for more info.
-
Chris Kampmeier commented at 1:26 PMI was just wondering about this a moment ago. Looks good, works as expected. +1
-
- Tag changed from enumerable, named_scope, patch to associations, enumerable, named_scope, patch
OK, here's an updated patch that implements
#many?for AssociationCollections, too.
Monday, January 12 2009
-
Chris Kampmeier commented at 5:33 AMI can't seem to confirm this.
I generated a fresh Rails app from
rails/master(at296ca4da1700eb27a7043112d22027444ea0e548), and vendor'd rails. I stuck aputs...
-
Chris Kampmeier created the ticket at 5:16 AMIt should be
descendants, with an A. In standard usage, "descendant" is the noun and "descendent" is the adjective. This is also the common usage across the Rai...
Wednesday, January 07 2009
-
Chris Kampmeier commented at 9:04 AMWhy is
:inversespecified explicitly? In your example, it's always the same as the class declaring the association.
Monday, December 01 2008
-
Chris Kampmeier commented at 7:20 AM+1, nice catch.
Tried it out, looks good. Tests are great; patch fixes the problem, although I don't know enough about method scoping to know if there's a bette...
-
Chris Kampmeier created the ticket at 6:15 AMEnumerable#many?went in recently, and it's nice to have. However, manyEnumerablemethods have corresponding implementations in theActiveRecord::NamedScope::S...
Sunday, November 30 2008
-
Chris Kampmeier commented at 2:18 AMThanks for the patch. I fixed that and did some general cleanup on
#expire_fragmentin http://github.com/lifo/docrails/...>