Brad Sumersford

I am experiencing this exact same issue.

After checking out 2-3-stable is does look like the vendor/ directory includes the rack-1.0.x version which does include the rewind addition that addresses the ...

It appears as though I was incorrect, the current version on rubyforge does not include the rewind fix. I had to perform wizardry beyond specifying remote and c...

It appears as http://github.com/rack/rack/commit/95f068e84b90fdfd6440314b0f86862a... takes care of the issue by calling .rewind on the input before trying to p...

This issue is similar to Tickets #2788 and #1875 with the same backtrace. I have been able to reproduce this reliably by sending an initial multipart request to...

When adding development only gems like 'faker' I place them in the development.rb configuration and all works as advertised.

Unfortunately, if the gem is depend...

Ryan, you are correct, I was just seeing any potential method (from monkey patching array before named_scope is evaluated) and not just array methods when I th...

Ryan, the problem with the patch you submitted, it will not trap any of the find_by_* varieties. Leads back to your point about the regular expression being ug...

Just using Topic.base.select(&:approved) would be a better workaround, but I still like my find_all :)

Not sure why it puts a semicolon after the & in a highlighted source code section,