Daniel Guettler
Not a member
Daniel Guettler's latest activity
Thursday, July 22 2010
-
Daniel Guettler commented at 1:53 PM@Jeremy : The reason why I kept them separate is because they need slightly different treatment to actually get the helpers. Therefor I think it is best to keep...
Monday, July 19 2010
-
Daniel Guettler commented at 11:02 PMMy original tests for Rails 2.3.5 came out at 6.1 however today they ran slightly faster and come out at 5.0
Rails 2.3.5 ======================================... -
Daniel Guettler commented at 10:41 PMAaron I can confirm even better performance after latest patches
Rails 3 before 'Minor performance improvment in notifications/fanout and active_record/log_su... -
Daniel Guettler commented at 9:42 PMFollow up on my last post adding some benchmarks
Base case Rails 2.3.5 ================================================= >> puts Benchmark.measure{5000.times{... -
Daniel Guettler commented at 8:59 PMI don't think it is needed to define all the methods. What I tried to do before with little performance impact was to call the methods directly on the relation ...
-
Daniel Guettler commented at 7:34 PM@aaron : I attached updated patch.
@drjoke : no this doesn't have any impact on find yet. Performance hit in find comes more or less completely from Arel
Sunday, July 18 2010
-
Daniel Guettler commented at 1:02 PMOk, attached patch against the latest version of rails master following the above guidelines.
Latest version now comes pretty close to the 2.3.5 base case:Rai... -
Daniel Guettler commented at 5:14 AMWell you can get a little but more performance out of it if you modify the log_subscriber 'sql' method a tiny bit.
Rails 3 with modified log_subscriber =======... -
Daniel Guettler commented at 4:53 AM@Patrik : Unfortunately you're right. I could squeeze out a tiny performance gain by changing the code a little, but most of the remaining difference comes from...