raggi's profile

raggi commented at 8:03 PM
Hongli sorry, but there's issues with your RubyGems suggestion, specifically, activation is actually different from require, as activation specifies a specific ...

raggi commented at 3:18 PM

Maybe add a generator that makes a script/runner?

That way it could be built by a rake task, rather than having a potentially non-working committed version?
raggi commented at 3:16 PM
Yup, portability is a bitch with this, we have the same problem with rackup for cgis in rack. No ideal solution, I just recommend to people that they write a .c...

raggi commented at 8:04 PM

What I mean is, when I asked

My question is, in the environment you're proposing to use, will adding a shebang line actually make the binary work?"

If you sai...
raggi commented at 7:46 PM

Agreed they are digressions.

I have not objected to adding a shebang, I have objected to the reason being "because RPS says so", because as stated, consistent a...
raggi commented at 4:28 PM

It is also worth considering these:

http://www.dwheeler.com/secure-programs/Secure-Programs-HOWTO/envir...
http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/

This...
raggi commented at 4:23 PM

In other words, can you provide a reason for adding it beyond "all unix binfiles have one"?

It is worth noting that whilst becoming increasingly rare, not all p...
raggi commented at 4:19 PM
Without a correct load path, a shebang is completely useless. Add the shebang, and then run bin/rails:
```
% bin/rails
Thor is not available.
If you ran this comma...
```

raggi commented at 2:04 PM
No, there's no reason rails should "force" you to use rubygems, however, the RPS has not yet provided one key aspect of information that is being completely ign...

raggi