pete_lacey
Not a member
pete_lacey's latest activity
Monday, February 23 2009
Friday, February 20 2009
-
pete_lacey commented at 8:46 PM@eloy: Nope not a test, it's the real thing. Until now, we've been using Ryan's famous approach to multi-model form support, which worked but had a lot of movin...
-
pete_lacey commented at 5:47 PM+1
I have the poster child application for testing nested attributes. It uses 27 deeply nested calls to accepts_nested_attributes_for and exercises them all sim...
Wednesday, February 11 2009
-
pete_lacey commented at 6:39 PMFinal note. I got a little smarter about Git and was able to apply both patches. I can now confirm this works and works in conjunction with nested attributes.
T...
-
pete_lacey commented at 5:43 PMGaspard,
Thanks! I thought that patch would help too, and tried it before reporting. Unfortunately, it's mutually incompatible right now (from a Git point of vi...
-
pete_lacey created the ticket at 3:34 PMI'm not sure how best to phrase this issue, and it might ultimately be a problem with association proxies, but the problem I am seeing in Rails Edge (as of 2009...
Sunday, February 08 2009
-
pete_lacey created the ticket at 2:19 PMMaybe this is intentional, but it seems that the :reject_if option of the accepts_nested_attributes_for macro does not work for has_one (and belongs_to ?) assoc...