Jaime Bellmyer
Not a member
Jaime Bellmyer's latest activity
Wednesday, June 03 2009
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 6:04 PMIs there anything I can/should be doing to move this ticket forward? I really think it's a valuable contribution, and I'd like to see it in Rails.
Monday, March 09 2009
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 6:35 PMThe results of the primary key check are now cached, to save processing time on subsequent inserts. I also added a test which verifies this behavior. I moved th...
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 3:39 PMI've rebased, and attached the updated patch file, patch-2086b.diff. I'll look into caching today, but I wanted to correct the conflict right away.
Monday, March 02 2009
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 6:48 AMThanks for the feedback! @Michael: I picked the best single point of failure, in my opinion. Creating is where the error occurs, and raising an exception on cre...
Saturday, February 28 2009
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 5:28 PMthis looks great! +1 from me. The tests make sense for shoring up rails, and they pass.
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 2:02 AMI think the patch needs to be updated with an e-mail address. I received this message when I tried to apply it per lighthouse instructions:
rails>git am < .....
Friday, February 27 2009
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 6:12 AMSorry, my post above started with "+1", but formatting seems to have mangled it. +1
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 6:10 AM- It includes/passes tests, and works as advertised, and seems to stick with rails conventions. At first I didn't see the usefulness, but I have to admit after t...
Thursday, February 26 2009
-
Jaime Bellmyer commented at 4:54 PMCan somebody with permissions please kill this ticket? I recently learned that this solution is not what the rails community wants. It's based on the legacy use...
-
Jaime Bellmyer created the ticket at 4:24 PMJoin tables for has_and_belongs_to_many relationships are not supposed to have primary keys. This is mentioned in a few places in the documentation, but remains...