Tom Stuart
Not a member
Tom Stuart's latest activity
Tuesday, October 21 2008
-
Tom Stuart commented at 9:32 AMThanks for the heads-up, Andrew. For the record, DHH said:
Rails already deals with resource routes that lead to nowhere. We give you a 406 Not Supported back....
Thursday, October 16 2008
Wednesday, October 15 2008
-
Tom Stuart commented at 12:13 PMThis is wrong. The
:namespaceoption is for internal use by thenamespacemethod, to support nested namespaces -- if you insist on setting it manually you must ...
-
Tom Stuart created the ticket at 10:18 AMAttached is a patch to allow explicit specification of which actions should be routed by
map.resources. For example:map.resources :posts, :actions => [:index,...
Monday, October 13 2008
-
Tom Stuart commented at 4:24 PMYes, this is now working great: bootstrap succeeds but generates "no specification file, run rake gems:refresh_specs" warnings for every unpacked gem; rake gems...
Sunday, October 12 2008
-
Tom Stuart commented at 9:13 AMFWIW I tried rewinding my project and applying this patch; now I get:
$ ./script/console Loading development environment (Rails 2.2.0) config/../vendor/rails/r...
Thursday, October 09 2008
-
Tom Stuart commented at 9:07 PMYou're right, it's the absence of the .specification file that's causing the failure. The gems were unpacked (in the past) with Rails 2.1's rake gems:unpack, so...
-
Tom Stuart commented at 9:19 AMFYI zdennis has reported the same issue (presumably) on http://github.com/rails/rails/co...>
-
Tom Stuart commented at 9:06 AMThis change broke gem loading in plugins, at least for my app. I've got BackgrounDRb installed in vendor/plugins; it depends on the packet gem, which is in vend...
Wednesday, October 08 2008
-
Tom Stuart created the ticket at 9:40 AMThe
:path_prefixand:name_prefixoptions are supported almost correctly on all routes, but they are only removed from the options hash individe_route_options...