Rails Ruby on Rails

Comments and changes to this ticket

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  yipdw October 13th, 2010 @ 06:12 PM

  URL scheme goof:

  https://gist.github.com/624421/417c372a474a16566989261c8e0f9944fe32...

  should be (for consistency)

  http://gist.github.com/624421/417c372a474a16566989261c8e0f9944fe3268ae

• 

  Ryan Bigg October 13th, 2010 @ 09:39 PM

  • State changed from “new” to “incomplete”
  • Importance changed from “” to “Low”

  Please attach a patch with a failing test to this ticket by following the "Contributing to Rails" guide.

  http://guides.rubyonrails.org/contributing_to_rails.html

• 

  Ryan Bigg October 19th, 2010 @ 08:27 AM

  Automatic cleanup of spam.

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Jonathan Julian November 18th, 2010 @ 04:35 AM

  This also raises when exists? is called on an association with an :include. Note that it only raises when it should return true. ActiveRecord 3.0.2

  A workaround, if you can use an id to check for existence:
  

  model.collection_singular_ids.include?(associated_id)
  

• 

  rails March 29th, 2011 @ 01:00 AM

  • State changed from “incomplete” to “open”

  This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been commented on for at least three months.

  The resources of the Rails core team are limited, and so we are asking for your help. If you can still reproduce this error on the 3-0-stable branch or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it and add "[state:open]" to your comment. This will reopen the ticket for review. Likewise, if you feel that this is a very important feature for Rails to include, please reply with your explanation so we can consider it.

  Thank you for all your contributions, and we hope you will understand this step to focus our efforts where they are most helpful.

• 

  rails March 29th, 2011 @ 01:00 AM

  • State changed from “open” to “stale”