This project is archived and is in readonly mode.
Let YARD document the railties gem
Reported by Brian Cardarella | September 3rd, 2010 @ 02:50 PM
It looks like railties was left out, not certain if that was intentional or not. But it would be nice to have the documentation for Generators accessible as well.
http://github.com/bcardarella/rails/commit/845520ee8821929be4fc11cf...
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Brian Cardarella September 3rd, 2010 @ 03:25 PM
- Title changed from “Let YARD document the railties gem” to “[PATCH] Let YARD document the railties gem”
-
Jeff Kreeftmeijer October 10th, 2010 @ 08:53 AM
- Title changed from “[PATCH] Let YARD document the railties gem” to “Let YARD document the railties gem”
- Tag set to “railties, yard”
- Importance changed from “” to “Low”
Could you create a patch for this following the contributor guide and give this ticket the "patch" tag when you attach it instead of adding "[PATCH]" to the title? That'll make sure it ends up in the open patches bin. :)
-
Brian Cardarella October 10th, 2010 @ 01:06 PM
This ticket can be closed. I made a pull request on Github and Yehuda merged it on there.
-
Jeff Kreeftmeijer October 10th, 2010 @ 01:07 PM
- State changed from “new” to “resolved”
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
<h2 style="font-size: 14px">Tickets have moved to Github</h2>
The new ticket tracker is available at <a href="https://github.com/rails/rails/issues">https://github.com/rails/rails/issues</a>
Brian Cardarella
Jeff Kreeftmeijer
Jeremy Kemper
Yehuda Katz (wycats)